I First Visited The Virtual Holocaust Museum Website And...

When I first visited the virtual Holocaust Museum website and researched the bodies of the site it represented discrimination and bigotry. The action taken upon the innocent the dominant leader Adolf Hitler and the members of his group carried out Jews. The website classified the term Genocide to commit violent crimes against groups with the intent to destroy the existence of the group. The central issue raised by the site is informing people the awareness of Genocide. When I was looking into the cases mentioned on the website many of the cases are â€Å"racial profiling† against culture, religion and race. During the Holocaust the Nazis were a group that had wealth and power. According to Koppelman, during slavery, African Americans dead bodies were tossed overboard for the sharks to eat (pg106). From reading this example, the Nazis were torturing the Jews and throwing their lifeless bodies around. This site raises awareness about genocide and how it occurred during the Ho locaust. My schema has changed tremendously because I knew very little facts about the Holocaust. I thought that the Jews were just being hated on and not being killed and slaughtered by the Nazis. I read the Anne Frank passage and she expressed how she felt during the time of the Holocaust and how it was a disgrace and how the Nazis were destroying the values and beliefs of the Jews. This reminds me of how immigrants come into the United States and were forced to be Americanize because of the United StatesShow MoreRelatedOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 Pagesdebates on modernism and postmodernism, and provides an advanced introduction to the heterogeneous study of organizations, including chapters on phenomenology, critical theory and psychoanalysis. Like all good textbooks, the book is accessible, well researched and readers are encouraged to view chapters as a starting point for getting to grips with the field of organization theory. Dr Martin Brigham, Lancaster Uni versity, UK McAuley et al. provide a highly readable account of ideas, perspectives and practices

Oedipus The King And The Allegory Of The Cave By Plato

One of the 20th centurys greatest Austrian and British philosopher of science, Karl Raimund Popper, stated â€Å" True ignorance is not the absence of knowledge, but the refusal to acquire it.† In many situations people choose to remain ignorant as it benefits them. This belief is often shaped, based on society or self pride. Society as a whole and individuals are intoxicated with their own perceptions based on opinions rather than reasoning. One must process the truth in order to adjust to it and obtain enlightenment through knowledge. In Oedipus the King by Sophocles and The Allegory of the Cave by Plato, in both scenarios each philosopher introduces characters who are ignorant but must eventually reach an intellectual awakening. Both†¦show more content†¦Ã¢â‚¬Å" From the beginning people like this have never managed, whether on their own or with the help by others, to see anything besides the shadows that are projected on the wall opposite them by the glow of the fire.†( Plato 1) Those who were kept in the cave had their own perception which became their reality, when in fact it was an illusion of reality. As a society they conducted a protocol that shaped their beliefs on society. In both literary works, each character undergoes the process of a comprehension of a certain veracity. They are introduced as ignorant to a greater truth. In Oedipus’ case, his lack of knowledge, causes his city to suffer as well, while the prisoners rely on opinion based senses to predict their reality which deprives them from any pure logic. Denial is often expressed in both scenarios given by the Plato and Sophocles. Denial is introduced when neither character wants to face the truth of their fate or reality. Oedipus often neglects the truth of his origins, despite the constant proof given to them by blind prophet Tiresias who unveils the truth. â€Å" He shall be proved father and brother both to his own children in his own house; to her that gave him birth, a son and husband both; a fellow sower in his father’s bed with that same father that he murdered.† ( 8 535-539) Oedipus’ tragic flaw, his pride and anger neglect him from accepting his fate. His persistence and arrogance is what ultimately leadsShow MoreRelatedEssay Applying Platos Allegory of the Cave1649 Words   |  7 PagesApplying Platos Allegory of the Cave to Oedipus Rex, Hamlet,and Thomas Becket Plato was one of the greatest philosophers of all time. He is recognized all over the world as one of the greatest minds of all time. Knowledge is required under compulsion has not hold on the mind.(Durant 24). Platos dialogues are the fruit of a rare mind; but the could not have kept their perennial freshness if they had not somehow succeeded in expressing he problems and the convictions that are common to PlatosRead MoreOedipus, the King and Allegory of the Cave - Comparative Analysis Essa759 Words   |  4 Pagesplay, Oedipus, the King, there are various instances where Oedipus tries to escape his destinyÂâ€"enlightenmentÂâ€"only to discover the truth that he cannot. Similarly, in Platos Allegory of the Cave the prisoner travails to understand and adjust to his newly visited environment. In both works, the men first had to realize their ignorance before they could begin to acquire knowledge and true understanding of the complexities of the human condition. Specifically, in O edipus, the King, it was Oedipus illusionRead MoreOedipus Paper857 Words   |  4 Pagesterms of the human experience, Plato’s Allegory of the Cave reveals that most humans would rather know the truth and suffer rather than be fed a lie for their entire lives. This idea is reflected in Sophocles’’ Oedipus the King because Oedipus seeks the truth and suffers greatly when it is found. Plato’s four stages of awareness are necessary for the final form of the good, which is the truth, to be found. In both the Allegory of the Cave and Oedipus the King, these four stages of awareness; ImaginationRead MoreThe Mind Is An Action2001 Words   |  9 PagesFrom allegories to theories of the body, all great thinkers have a mind that is different, in which contributes to the world for further use and exploration. In depth, philosopher Plato, thinker Francis Bacon, and psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud, have all been put into perspective for new ways of developing and analyz ing thought. Initially, philosopher Plato with his work of The Allegory of the Cave is still on display at the present, ultimately used to examine the age of enlightenment. Plato, wasRead MoreThe Allegory Of The Cave Proposed By Plato1595 Words   |  7 PagesThe allegory of the cave proposed by Plato includes the representation of the levels of knowledge. As we get closer to the exit, we get more knowledgeable and wiser we get, thus becoming better selves. Literature represents part of this knowledge, it has been a fundamental part of understanding our society, and has archived and developed the events and thoughts that made the world in which we live today. The more we read, the more we understand about us as well as learning from other peoples’ experiencesRead More Plato, Sir Francis Bacon, and Albert Camus: What is knowledge?2227 Words   |  9 Pagespossible. According to them, the only things that could be known were skills that were subjective to the user. Skepticism of this varie ty was encountered by one of the great minds of philosophy, Socrates, who spent much of his life, as we know it through Plato, arguing against sophism and its many forms in his pursuit of attempting to actually discover what could be known and if anyone actually did know anything. Knowledge, to Socrates, was a thing called arete or virtue, and the only thing Socrates knewRead MoreAncient And Medieval Civilizations1805 Words   |  8 Pageshuman condition such as; What it means to live just and good? How do we best order relationships for the common good? What do we know and how do we know it? these themes have been recurrent in the stories of Gilgamesh, the Bible, Plato’s Cave and the Oedipus Trilogy. Further analysis has shown that to live a just and good life is to first gain knowledge and understand what it means to be good and just. Putting yourself first enables you to help others and lastly we are only able to really knowRead MoreHow to Read Lit Like a Prof Notes3608 Words   |  15 Pagesechoed. b. See plays as a pattern, either in plot or theme or both. Examples: i. Hamlet: heroic character, revenge, indecision, melancholy nature ii. Henry IV—a young man who must grow up to become king, take on his responsibilities iii. Othello—jealousy iv. Merchant of Venice—justice vs. mercy v. King Lear—aging parent, greedy children, a wise fool 7. †¦Or the Bible a. Before the mid 20th century, writers could count on people being very familiar with Biblical stories, a common touchstone a writerRead More Perspective on Religion Herman Melvilles Moby-Dick Essay5370 Words   |  22 Pagesand tolerant religious perspective is his belief in the dignity of all human beings, a dignity that derives not from government mandate or legal fiat, but from divine omnipresence. In a crucial passage, Ishmael speaks of this dignity that is not of kings and robes, but that abounding dignity which has no robed investiture (113). Everyone, or at least every man, has this dignity: Thou shalt see it shining in the arm that wields a pick or drives a spike (113). This dignity comes directly from God

Good Faith And Best Interest Of The Company †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Good Faith And Best Interest Of The Company. Answer: Introduction The subject matter of the present case is to define the term good faith and best interest of the company and the relationship between the best interest of the company and in the interest of the company as a whole. The Corporation Act of 2001 in Australia deals with the subject matter or any case related to the company or the corporation. In the present case, there are three terms used, such as good faith, best interest of the company and in the interest of a company as a whole (Anderson 2014). The terms are interconnected with each other that are based on the duty of a director of a company. Under the Corporation Act 2001, it has been stated that every directors has certain duties towards the shareholders and as well as the other stakeholders and they should be maintained good faith while performing their job (Barker, Barton and Fagan 2016). Therefore, it can be observed that, it is the primary duty of the director of a company to act in good faith for the best interest of the compan y as well as in the interest of the company as a whole. The objective of the act is to secure the interest of the shareholders and so that the companys future becomes prosperous. It is true that the terms are interconnected to each other but there are certain differences can be observed regarding the best interest of the company and in the interest of the company as a whole (Bolimos, Bolimos and Choo 2017). Good faith The term good faith means to do some job or work sincerely. Under the Corporation Act the term good faith denotes to identify the acts of the director in the course of their duties. Under the purview of Corporation Act 2001, two section 181 and section 184 deal with the term good faith. In every company directors plays an important role, grab an important position for the management of the company in a better way, and work in that way for the betterment of the company (Brown and Lawrence 2017). It is the primary duty of a director to look into the matter responsibly and to make a connection between the company and the stakeholders. Stakeholders consist of certain kinds of persons without whom the company cannot be incorporated or cannot be continued its duties (Chia and Ramsay 2016). It can be stated that if the director of a company does not work in good faith, there can be certain contradictions happen regarding the procedure of the company and the primary objective of the Act cannot be fulfilled. The director should keep in mind that he must perform his duties on the basis of the interest of the company and shareholders. Law to secure his own interest without securing the interest of the company bars him (Dixon 2016). The principle of good faith is based on the principle of equity. Under the Corporation Act 2001, there are certain fiduciary duties and certain statutory duties present and it is the duty of every director to act on the basis (Hannigan 2015). By fiduciary duties it is meant, something that is related to the trust and the term is connected and/ or must regarding the person posted in an important place. The term good faith is used to denote the performance of the companys director so that they can maintain honesty in the job environment. From the definition, it can be clarified that what are the importance of a director in a company. The directors of a company are represented themselves as a governing body as the executive head of the company (Hiller 2013). It has been stated under section 180 of the Corporation Act that every director of a company should act diligently and must show certain care to the shareholders of the company. It is the primary object of the director of the company to act in good faith and the relevant provisions of the same as discussed under section 181 of the Corporation Act 2001. It has been stated under the section that there are certain mandatory duties for the director of a company and one of such duty is to act in good faith. It has been stated earlier that the director of the company holds an important position in the administration of the company and therefore if the directors have failed to make them trustworthy, then the future of the company can be affected at large (Mills 2014). The primary objective of section 184 Corporation Act is to secure the interest of the company and therefore if there is any breach regarding the good faith by the director of the company has been observed and allegation brought against the director of a company, he shall be liable to face the relevant provisions of law regarding the breach. There is another provision under the Corporation Act 2001 that is mentioned under section 184. This section is quite different than the section 181 of the Corporation Act to certain extent (Nicholls, Donald and Liu 2015). The term good faith has been defined under section 181 of the Corporation Act, where section 184 of the Corporation Act deals with the criminal breaches made by the director regarding the term good faith. Certain penalties or also imposed on the directors if the allegations made against the direc tors of the company regarding the good faith has been proved or has been supported by the evidences. A director can violate the position of good faith in case where they will be failed to perform their duties sincerely and certain reckless acts done by the directors during the course of their employment (Riaz, Ray and Ray 2015). In ASIC v Adler (2002), it was held that it is the duty of the director to act diligently and in good faith with the shareholders of the company. Under the scenario of the case, a non executive director of a company has both certain shares regarding the insurance company and with an intention to cheat or deceive the company and tried to proceed with the same ulterior motive. It has been observed that Adler was not disclose all the relevant facts to the shareholders and his colleagues including the other directors of the company and therefore held liable under the provision of the section 181 of the Corporation Act regarding violation of the position of good faith. In ASIC v Macro Realty Developments Pty Ltd (2016) it has been observed that the fiduciary duties of a director has been violated by the development company and therefore help liable under section 181 of the Corporation Act 2001. Best interest of the company The term best interest of the company stands on the interest of the shareholders. It is no doubt that the shareholders of a company are playing an important role in the administration of the company. The economic backbone of the company is very much dependent on the sets of the shareholders on certain circumstances. Shareholders are buying the share of a company and hence they help the Company to gain liquid cash. Being holding a fiduciary position it is that the duty of a director to act for the benefit of the shareholders and to secure the interest of the shareholders. Except the investment every shareholder of a company and holding certain important places regarding the appointment of the director and regarding the participation in the Annual General Meeting of the company. The Corporation Act 2001 was enacted to secure the interest of the company as well as the interest of the shareholders. It helps to give security to the shareholders from the arbitrary acts of the directors. Care intelligence at the most important thing for the directors of a company while communicated to the shareholders. The provision regarding the section 180 of the Corporation Act states about the care and diligence of the director of a company. In ASIC v Cassimetes, it has been held at the director of certain duty towards the shareholders and act for the interest of the shareholders as a whole. The Directors are stopped by the Corporation Act to receive the shareholders of a company of to snatch away the basic right of the shareholders. In this case the directors of the storm company have projected a business model and announced the shareholders of the investors to invest their money into the project 2 on a lump sum amount after the maturity of the period. The director of the co mpany had failed to make the investors aware about the risk of the investment and after financial break down, all the invested money had lost. Therefore, there is a clear laxity regarding the interest of the shareholders have been observed in this case. Director of a company should have the intention to work in such a manner so that the acts can be resulted in the prosperity of the company and should have some intentions to work positively. In a company, directors are holding such important position and therefore it can be said that the directors of a company have certain fiduciary duties to be performed during the course of their business. The law has prescribed certain provisions on the fiduciary duties and it is stated under the act that the directors should be performed their duties or the fiduciary duties honestly (Hiller 2013). From this aspect, it is their responsibility to deal with the shareholders with due diligence. In Sharp Ors. v Blank and Ors. (2015), it was observed by the court that every director should be loyal when acting with the shareholders of the company and have to provide relevant information regarding any kind of works. In Starlink International Group v Coles Super market, it was a list against the supermarket that a contract have been signed in between the company and the supermarket and afterwards the contract, the Supermarket head terminated all the provisions of the contract without maintain the relevant provisions to this aspect. Therefore, a case was filed against the supermarket and the court ordered that the supermarket has failed to show any evidences regarding the diligence performed by the supermarket regarding the contract. Best interest of the company: The second question of this paper is based on the differences between the best interest of the company and in the interest of the company as a whole and through this chapter, it has been mentioned in a detailed way. It is clear from the previous answer that the time best interest of the company is interconnected with the interest of the shareholders of the company. It is an obligation to the directors of the company to act in good faith regarding the shareholders and penalties are provided in the provision of the Corporation Act if any breach has happened by the directors to this respect. In Hutton v Wester Cork Railway Co. (1883), it was observed that the director of a company hold certain fiduciary positions and therefore it is their ability to act for the interest of the shareholders (Tills and Wills 2016). It is of no doubt that the shareholders of the company hold certain important position in the company and there's interest should be secured by the directors as they hold certain fiduciary position in the company. In the profession of Australia, shareholders are playing an important role regarding the administration of the company. Therefore, it is there right to get certain benefits so that there interest can be secured and it is the duty of the director of the company to disclose all the relevant facts and matters to facilitate the process of securing the interest. In the interest as a whole The term interest of the company as a whole is not limited to the shareholders of the company only, but it means the interest of the company as a whole. In every company the administration of the executive works are performed by the stakeholders that include the director also. Therefore, it can be said that the administrative over the executive duties of a company is depended all the acts of the stakeholders. In Aberdeen Ry. V Blaikie(1854), it was observed that a director of a company has to show interest for the stakeholders as a whole and should not be Limited after certain categories of the stakeholders. Relationship between the two terms: It can be observed that a company is a separate legal entity through different case laws. It has also been mentioned that the stakeholders are the part of it and the company cannot make any steps or move without the directors and the other stakeholders. Sometimes, it can be seen that the directors are also included under the definition of the stakeholders. The directors are represented the company in various occasions and therefore it is the duty to act in good faith or to act diligently. Under the Corporation Act there are certain provisions dealing with the acts of the directors and regarding the breach in the directors duties (Li 2014). In Salomon v Salomon (1897), it can be stated that a company is a separate legal entity and therefore it is the duty of the director of a company to act for the interest of the company and not to the interests of the specific person of the company (Viven-Wilksch 2015). It is a historical case regarding the company act and the principle of lifting the corporate veil has been raised from the case. In Sharp v Blank others, certain contradictory profession was made as against the case of Solomon. In this case, it was observed by the court that share holders at the part of the company and company is not separate from the shareholders or the stakeholders. The principle of interest of the company as a whole has been established in this case and it was held by the court that the director of a company should act by maintaining the following principles laid down under the previous case (Welsh 2014). In Perceval v Wright (1902), an allegation against the director has been made and it was stated that he had failed to provide sufficient interest to the company while performing his duties. The presiding officer of the case was point out certain relevant provisions regarding the apps of the detector and stated that the primary object of a director is to secure the interest of the company and the interest of the shareholders at the secondary object. From the above statement, it is to be stated that there is a difference between the two terms. By best interest of the company, it means for the interest of the shareholders and in the interest of the company as a whole means for the interest of the company only. In the later part, it is to be observed from the various decisions of the court that company is a separate legal entity and shareholders are just a part of it (Whincop 2017). It is to be stated that the director of a company should have to take personal care to the company only and not to the shareholders. Therefore, it can be stated that the two terms are contradictory in nature. However, both the terms are inter-related to each other as both the terms are connected to the interest of the company. Conclusion Therefore, it is cleared from the above mentioned discussion that all the three terms of this case that is the good faith, best interest of the company and in the interest of the company as a whole is interconnected to each other. There is a prolonged study about the directors duties and responsibilities towards the company and the shareholders has been discussed in this paper. All the relevant principles of law as well as a profession of the Corporation Act 2001 have been discussed in this paper. The contradiction between the best interest of the company and in the interest of the company as a whole is still remain unsolved. There are different notions about the same has been taken place in different cases. How work the main outcome of the paper is that director is holds certain fiduciary position in the management of the company and he has to secure the interests of the company as well as the interests of the shareholders during the performance of his duty. References: Aberdeen Ry. V Blaikie (1854) UKHL 1 Anderson, H., 2014. Directors' Liability for Fraudulent Phoenix ActivityA Comparison of the Australian and UK Approaches.Journal of Corporate Law Studies,14(1), pp.139-173. ASIC v Adler (2002) NSWSC 171 ASIC v Casemates [2016] FCA 1023 ASIC v Macro Realty Developments Pty Ltd (2016) FCA 292 Barker, S., Baker-Jones, M., Barton, E. and Fagan, E., 2016. Climate change and the fiduciary duties of pension fund trusteeslessons from the Australian law.Journal of Sustainable Finance Investment,6(3), pp.211-244. Bolimos, I.A., Bolimos, I.A., Choo, K.K.R. and Choo, K.K.R., 2017. Online fraud offending within an Australian jurisdiction.Journal of Financial Crime,24(2), pp.277-308. Brown, A.J. and Lawrence, S.A., 2017. STRENGTH OF ORGANISATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWING PROCESSESANALYSIS FROM AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND. Chia, H.X. and Ramsay, I., 2016. An Analysis of Shareholder Resolutions Involving Australian Listed Companies from 2004 to 2013. de Melo Bandeira, G.C.S., 2013. Corruption and social and economic criminal law: Criminology, criminal policy, political science and law economicsA new idea about criminal liability of legal entities.Tkhne,11(2), pp.105-113. Dixon, O., 2016. Honesty without Fear-Whistleblower Anti-Retaliation Protections in Corporate Codes of Conduct.Melb. UL Rev.,40, p.168. Hannigan, B., 2015.Company law. Oxford University Press, USA. Hiller, J.S., 2013. The benefit corporation and corporate social responsibility.Journal of Business Ethics,118(2), pp.287-301. Hiller, J.S., 2013. The benefit corporation and corporate social responsibility.Journal of Business Ethics,118(2), pp.287-301. Huggins, A., Simnett, R. and Hargovan, A., 2015. Integrated reporting and directors concerns about personal liability exposure: Law reform options.Company and Securities Law Journal,33, pp.176-195. Hutton v Wester Cork Railway Co. (1883)23 Ch D 654 Li, Y., 2014. The impact of corporate governance on the corporate social responsibility of small corporation in australia: a structural equation modeling approach. InWEI International Academic Conference Proceeding, New Orleans, USA. Mills, C.W., 2014.The racial contract. Cornell University Press. Nicholls, R., Donald, M.S. and Liu, K., 2015. It's a Small World after All: Using Social Network Analysis to Investigate Systemic Risk in the Australian Superannuation Sector. Percival v Wright [1902] 2 Ch. 401 Riaz, Z., Ray, S. and Ray, P.K., 2015. Collibration as an alternative regulatory mechanism to govern the disclosure of director and executive remuneration in Australia.International Journal of Corporate Governance,6(2-4), pp.241-274. Salomon v Salomon Co. Ltd (1897) AC 22 Sharp Ors. V Blank and Ors. (2015) EWHC 3220 (Ch) Starlink International GroupPty Ltdv Coles SupermarketsAustralia Pty Ltd Anor [2011] NSWSC 1154 Tills, M. and Wills, C., 2016. Corporate law: Directors found guilty of breaching duties following corporation's breaches.Governance Directions,68(10), p.624. Viven-Wilksch, J., 2015. The adventures of good faith: can legal history and international developments provide guidelines for Australia?.Alternative Law Journal,40(2), pp.89-92. Welsh, M., 2014. Realising the public potential of corporate law: Twenty years of civil penalty enforcement in Australia.Fed. L. Rev.,42, p.217. Whincop, M.J., 2017.Corporate governance in government corporations. Routledge.

The Direct and Indirect Impact of Rhetoric Essay Example For Students

The Direct and Indirect Impact of Rhetoric Essay The Direct and Indirect Impact of RhetoricEmory Lott12/05/96English 1001In the world that we live in, rhetoric always affects and is apart of everything that happens. Rhetoric, in its broadest sense, iscommunication, and how people relate to each other. The movie The Color Purpleis about relationships. Therefore rhetoric plays a very important role in thismovie. Throughout The Color Purple the impact of rhetoric can be seen in twogroups of people, the communicator, or rhetor, and the audience. Celie, themain character of the movie, shows the impact of rhetoric in almost every aspectof her life. The effects of rhetoric in Celies life are apparent through herrelationships with Mr. Johnson, Shug Avery, and Sofia. We will write a custom essay on The Direct and Indirect Impact of Rhetoric specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The relationship that Celie has with Mr. Johnson is unbalancedfrom the first time they meet. Celies complacent and gentle nature leave herat the mercy of Albert Johnsons more dominant attitude. The rhetoric that sheexpresses to him, of innocence and always complying to his orders, forces her tolive a large portion of her life sheltered and overshadowed by Albert, whocontinuously beats her into submission. Celie also passes on what she learnedfrom Mister to his son Harpo, the rhetoric of the importance of a man givinghis wife a good beating. Albert Johnson does not even realize how importantCelie is to him until she is gone. At that point he returns some of the lovethat is shown to him by helping Nettie and her family to return to the UnitedStates in order to see Celie. This action shows the impact of Mr. Johnsonsrhetoric on Celie by returning to her the first person that she ever loved. Both the rhetoric that Mr. Johnson exposes Celie to and the rhetoric that Celiereveals to Albert Johnson have a very important role in Celies life in themovie The Color Purple. Celie also shares a strong relationship with Shug Avery. Celiefirst meets Shug when she is drunk and has a very bad temper. Celie just triesto comfort the sick stranger in her house. In this unselfish act of kindness,Celies rhetoric ends up giving her the best friend that she has for a long time. Shug then returns the rhetoric of kindness and love that Celie first shows herby writing a song to cheer her up. Celies newfound friend also teaches her howto smile, and perhaps how to enjoy life and respect herself. Shug Avery alsohelps Celie discover that Nettie is writing her and where to find the letters. Celies rhetoric in her relationship with Shug let her gain a new friend,contact with her beloved sister, and rediscover a joy and purpose to her life. Rhetoric also has a strong impact in the relationship betweenCelie and Sofia. After Sofias jail sentence she is very depressed, and Celiehelps her do the grocery shopping. Showing her rhetoric of friendship andkindness once again, Celie shows Sofia a friend when she needs one the most. Atthe family dinner one night, Celie expresses her true feelings in an outburst ofrhetoric. This reawakens the spirit inside Sofia and allows her to admit toCelie how she helped her and that people do understand and love her. Withoutfirst affecting Sofia with her rhetoric, Celie would not have experienced theassurance of Sofias rhetoric in her life. Rhetoric is present in the relationships between Celie and Mr. Johnson, Shug Avery, and Sofia. This rhetoric affects Celie in many ways andfrom different directions. Celie is affected by how she relates to othersthrough rhetoric and how others relate to her through rhetoric. In some casesCelies rhetoric has an impact on someone else and then later works its way backto her. Mr. Johnson is exposed to Celies kindness and friendship a long timebefore he shows her some of the same respect. Shug Avery is also affected bythe rhetoric of Celie before she is in turn impacted by Shugs friendship. .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198 , .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198 .postImageUrl , .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198 , .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198:hover , .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198:visited , .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198:active { border:0!important; } .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198:active , .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198 .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u3ef5fd58eee818281027fbf680b50198:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Big Knight Switch EssayCelie gives Sofia the assurance that she needs and then receives the same fromSofia when she is in need of support. In all of these relationships Celie isaffected directly by the rhetoric of the other people and indirectly by theinfluence of her own rhetoric.